Me thinks that you don’t understand logistics or math. If Russia started the invasion with 360,000 troops and more than $360,000 troops have been wounded then that would be a 100% casualty rate. Fortunately for Russia. Unfortunately, for Russians, there are a lot of men in Russia and the Russian leaders like to use meat grinder tactics.
From what are analysts are able to scratch up roughly 80% of the combatants that have seen action have been wounded thus far. Replacements have been regularly cycled in.
Hey dipshit, did you read the link you posted? That’s the number I’m referencing. It claims that 1.107.480 out of 900.000 troops have been wounded, can you figure out how we know this is obvious bullshit? Hint: one of the numbers is a bit higher than the other.
Unfortunately, for Russians, there are a lot of men in Russia and the Russian leaders like to use meat grinder tactics.
But according to your link they’ve already run out of men. Also, the Russian ground forces are only about ~550.000 troops, you expect me to believe that an additional ~557.480 from the navy and air force were also injured? In a land war? IN A NAVY OF ~160.000 AND AN AIR FORCE OF ~165.000? THESE NUMBERS ARE LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE!
They’re clearly trying to evoke the “muh asiatic hordes” idea and imply that they’re conscripting ridiculous amounts of people because they’ve already lost all their actual soldiers
It’s especially ludicrous for them to say that, it’s such obvious blatant projection when there’s overwhelming evidence that Ukraine is the one doing that, even the mainstream media is admitting it these days
www.minusrus.com/en
100% of the Russian armed forces is either dead or wounded? You can’t seriously believe these insane propaganda numbers LMFAO
Who’s fighting against the Ukrainian army? Ghosts? Zombies? Fucking clown.
Me thinks that you don’t understand logistics or math. If Russia started the invasion with 360,000 troops and more than $360,000 troops have been wounded then that would be a 100% casualty rate. Fortunately for Russia. Unfortunately, for Russians, there are a lot of men in Russia and the Russian leaders like to use meat grinder tactics.
From what are analysts are able to scratch up roughly 80% of the combatants that have seen action have been wounded thus far. Replacements have been regularly cycled in.
Hey dipshit, did you read the link you posted? That’s the number I’m referencing. It claims that 1.107.480 out of 900.000 troops have been wounded, can you figure out how we know this is obvious bullshit? Hint: one of the numbers is a bit higher than the other.
But according to your link they’ve already run out of men. Also, the Russian ground forces are only about ~550.000 troops, you expect me to believe that an additional ~557.480 from the navy and air force were also injured? In a land war? IN A NAVY OF ~160.000 AND AN AIR FORCE OF ~165.000? THESE NUMBERS ARE LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE!
They’re clearly trying to evoke the “muh asiatic hordes” idea and imply that they’re conscripting ridiculous amounts of people because they’ve already lost all their actual soldiers
It’s especially ludicrous for them to say that, it’s such obvious blatant projection when there’s overwhelming evidence that Ukraine is the one doing that, even the mainstream media is admitting it these days