• NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Blockades are usually enforced by shooting at violating ships. And “shooting at more civilians isn’t the way to do it” then what is? Because there’s no world where “Just shut up and watch genocide happen” is the right answer.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      What? Shooting civilians is never the answer. Did you really just advocate for that???

      2 wrongs don’t make a right.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Then what is the right answer? Because as long as they’re not directly shooting and killing people they’re well within their rights to do anything to stop the genocide of Gaza.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not sure about rights, because they are shooting out of their territorial waters. But the “rights”, or perhaps “powers” of any nation only go as far as they can enforce them.

          So right now Yemen is indeed expressing itself, but they are finding out they don’t really have the power?

          Ultimately, protest is valid and what’s happening in Gaza is a genocide. But killing (or endangering) third parties who are just working a shift is always wrong.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            AFAIK they didn’t kill anyone. They’re also pretty clear about their condition for allowing ships to pass.

            Shooting violators is just how you enforce a blockade; it’s what the British did against the Germans.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              And that’s a good thing, but if you attack ships with people on them, you’ve endangered them. Via some bad luck they could have killed people.

              Also the waters are shared and highly contested, so the blockade isn’t clean.

              And as I said ultimately you can only have a blockade if you can enforce it. Day by day it is becoming clear they cannot.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      A blockade is an act of war. A blockade of the suez canal is an act of war against the 90% of the planet.