• werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      We usually start New Year’s with good news and promises we won’t keep… Not with total failures. This is not good for their reputation.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nothing they’ve been doing has been good for their reputation for about 5 or 6 years now. That’s what happens when people who don’t understand the industry start being managers rather than engineers.

    • Pirasp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This probably has nothing to do with maintenance. The plane was only two months old. Enough for some inspections, but nobody would suspect or look for cracks in the fuselage at that point. So it’s probably a manufacturing issue.

        • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Anything views quality control as an expense.

          Are you even listening to yourself?

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            39
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            There is a vocal segment of Lemmy that can ONLY frame the world through the lens of class warfare and nothing else. That’s why they hijack every topic and thread with the same rhetoric. They have no plan, guidance or recommendations on what to do. They are only here to inform us about the ills of capitalism as if the collective psyche woke up yesterday and forgot all of history. They are so enlightened and privileged that they can’t help themselves in their need to share this valuable knowledge with everyone else. Capitalism bad. That’s it. Then they scuttle off to the next thread and start over. That’s the extent of “the Revolution”.

            • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yes god thank you.

              I thought I was going crazy, every single thread that’s even remotely (very remotely) connected to politics is full of this.

              I’m seriously worried for the platform, because this shit is going to turn people off hard.

              Even saw someone suggesting an assassination of a supreme court justice AND PEOPLE WERE FUCKING DEFENDING IT. The mods removed the comment luckily, but I still managed to get like 30 downvotes on a “don’t suggest assassinations, be better than them” comment, just check my history.

              We’re becoming fucking Truth Social or Parler or whatever of the left.

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                I feel like it’s too late for Lemmy. The echo chamber is already pretty strong. I hope I’m wrong.

              • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                I mean, I don’t advocate political assassinations, but I also recognize that the SC really doesn’t have any avenues for the people to remove a judge other than violence.

                A lot of problems would be solved if the people could call votes of no confidence.

                • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You can recognize it without suggesting anything, that’s completely fine in my book.

                  And yeah agreed, it’s stupid that there’s no mechanism like that

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Can’t judges be impeached?

                  Why are you downvoting? Judges can and have been impeached. The comment above implied this wasnt true.

            • Zorque@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              I mean, I recommend voting and being active politically and socially, but there’s always people who hate discussing politics at all and just want to live in their middle class bubble thats keeps on shrinking.

              But, sorry that people point out negative things in your vicinity, it must really suck when you’re taken out of your self-imposed apolitical safe zone.

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                What a stupid retort. Are you 12? “Being active politically and socially” whatever the fuck that means.

                I’m 38 and I moved to the US from eastern Europe. You know nothing about the life or hardship I endured under communist dictatorship.

                I welcome talking about difficult topics. Let’s do that. But let’s also not kid ourselves the vast majority of you guys are not interested in having those “difficult conversations” and are only here for the brownie internet points. You want to have the adult conversation? Let’s skip the moral grandstanding about capitalism and go straight to actionable items beyond being “politically and socially active”.

          • Zorque@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I was just reframing the statement based on the previous commenters nitpicking.

            The point being they consider it an unwelcome expense instead of part of the necessary cost of doing business.

    • Tannah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Aircraft maintenance is heavily regulated. This was a new plane, and the result of the failure is that all planes of that type have been grounded.

      There are plenty of issues caused by corporate greed and lack of regulation as it is, but this isn’t one of them.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The story of the 737 MAX is corporate greed. It’s just by Boening, not the operator. However, the operators heavily influence the choices by Boening.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You know what, you’re right. ‘Le capitalism bad’. Now what? What the fuck do you propose? Get us to the revolution man. C’mon. Let’s go. I’m ready! Let’s goooooo. Tell us what to do next! I’m listening.

      Edit: wait, so I’m asking what we should do about it and I’m getting downvotes? I thought capitalism was bad. Shouldn’t we DO something about it? Or is it just performative for you guys? Pedal to the metal. Put up or shut up. Let’s do this. I’m ready…let’s GOOOO

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Apparently some planes are designed so the side doesn’t fall off at all. I just don’t want people thinking planes aren’t safe!

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Not really a window. It’s a plug put in where an optional emergency exit door would be. (Or so I’ve read elsewhere)

    • Madlaine@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      This type of aircraft comes equipped with a rear emergency exit door, used mainly by international airlines, and has a seat configuration that allows for more passengers on the plane. Most U.S. airliners don’t use that configuration and design the area to appear as a window from the inside of the aircraft.

    • shiftenter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Assuming you aren’t petrified, we’ve got some incredible new views we bet you thought were previously impossible!

    • Piranha Phish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Optional?!

      Imagine the lawsuits if/when somebody dies due to an onboard fire/smoke.

      I wouldn’t take this seriously if it weren’t for the fact that Boeing’s propensity for up-charging for basic safety features didn’t contribute to the crashes of two 737 Max 8.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s optional based on on the interior buildout of the plane. It depends on the number of seats and seating arrangement. When it’s not needed for an order, they bolt in a “plug” that fills the space where the door would have been.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Optional, yes. They put emergency exits in different places depending on the seating arrangement ordered.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is it bad that my first thought on reading the headline was ‘it’s gonna be a fucking MAX, isn’t it?’

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    ‘There was a kid in that row, his shirt was sucked off him and out of the plane. His mother was holding onto him to make sure he didn’t go with it,’ a man on the first flight said

    New phobia unlocked

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well, the fact that it was still able to make the landing is remarkable. This isn’t the Comet after all…

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Airplanes are crazy over engineered. Something like half the systems can fail and they’ll still be able to land the plane.

      The safety regulations are written in blood, but they’ve continually prevented more disasters.

      I’m sure the MAX 9 is going to have a lot of investigation done very soon.

    • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Very different modes of failure. Metal fatigue ripping apart fault lines in structural metal is very different from an emergency exit door popping out.