Is Musk competing with Zuck for the worst branding ever?

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Meta’s rebranding at least makes sense. The company has been more than Facebook for a long time, so collecting everything under a different umbrella isn’t too far fetched. Facebook still exists as a product, so they haven’t thrown away all the brand value. Google did kind of the same with Alphabet.

    Rebranding Twitter to X doesn’t make sense at all.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      But they’re not just re-branding. Twitter is now under some kind of corporate shell company. I haven’t seen much coverage of that, but my suspicion is that it’s intended to act as some kind of insulator to contain Twitter’s debts.

      Like when they break a company into pieces and put everyone’s debts and no assets into a single part and then that part declares bankruptcy and all the debt magically goes away, leaving everything else with lots of assets and no debts and a future that looks really rosy. I can’t help but think that this is something similar to that.

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Part of me wonders if it’s an attempt to tank the SEO, so people can’t search for or news or easily talk about the site anymore - because it’s been nothing but bad.