poVoq@slrpnk.netM to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 1 year agoSolarpunk at the 37C3slrpnk.netimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1183arrow-down1imageSolarpunk at the 37C3slrpnk.netpoVoq@slrpnk.netM to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareV @beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoThanks for the info. I see why they did it then. Defensive copyright is fine for a good cause.
minus-squareLuci@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoIt looks like a lot of the copyright flak came from a now deleted tweet that didn’t understand CC licensing. It happens.
Thanks for the info. I see why they did it then. Defensive copyright is fine for a good cause.
It looks like a lot of the copyright flak came from a now deleted tweet that didn’t understand CC licensing. It happens.