• TwanHE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      He means they have a problem with Linux users. What other reason would there be to buy up games and remove native Linux support the second its removed from the steam store? (Rocket League for example)

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Epic Games Store doesn’t have a Linux client, so it’s understandable from a business perspective to not develop a product no new customers will be able to buy.

        It’s a middle finger to existing customers though, especially with the outdated Linux version being downloaded by default. They should prioritize proton to enable online play on multiplayer game, but as established, they don’t care about Steam Linux users

    • GustavoM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Eh… “gaslighting 101” – swears randomly (against the victim/target), throws in a (non-random) praise to “raise the fire even more”, refuses to elaborate.

    • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Linux users have too much self respect and expect too much privacy and control over their own devices. That’s a problem.

    • atmur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think he means the whole “Not enough users to justify porting applications, users don’t use it because applications don’t support it” thing.

      The problem is that logic has been dead for years. Users are here. The Steam Deck is wildly popular. Tim Sweeney is just a dumbass.