Speaking at a campaign event in Iowa, Trump said it was important to scrutinize the vote in the battleground states likely to determine the general election. He singled out the biggest cities in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia.
“So the most important part of what’s coming up is to guard the vote. And you should go into Detroit and you should go into Philadelphia and you should go into some of these places, Atlanta,” Trump said in Ankeny, a suburb of Des Moines.
Trump’s comments foreshadow what is likely to be a contentious election in November 2024. Despite the failure of dozens of lawsuits filed by Trump and his allies challenging the outcome in 2020, Trump continues to claim, without evidence, that he lost to U.S. President Joe Biden due to fraud.
deleted by creator
You going to shoot the ballots too? All those guns and the best you can offer is pagentry.
You haven’t stopped a fascist running. You haven’t stopped the gerrymandering. You haven’t stopped corporate lobbying. You haven’t stopped far-right mass shootings.
But apparently we’re supposed to line up to suck your dick because you’re going to puff out your chest and also fail to prevent voter intimidation?
You’re the same problem in a blue shirt.
I see you have contributed nothing.
Oh well, add me to the list of things you’re going to fix with your super cool magic guns then.
What is your solution?
If Republicans successfully cause voter intimidation in a Democratic stronghold then those individuals are charged with a federal crime and the election continues regardless of their stupidity. If Democrats enter armed conflict with those Republicans, people fucking die for no good reason.
deleted by creator
Oh good, I’m sure the Republicans wouldn’t do something illegal like try to alter the outcome of an election!
So if Republican civilians successfully cause voter intimidation, those civilians go to jail. Meanwhile the election continues regardless, and those intimidated voters would still help Republican politicians win their seats. And you say that like that’s okay.
I’m not sure if there has ever been a case in the last several decades where a voter intimidation attempt altered an election outcome, it’s kind of difficult to search for. Probably because all such attempts are inevitably ineffective under a system of laws.
Please correct me if I’m wrong. Plenty of people convicted of the crime all the time, but almost no information on what happens afterwards if the impact were significant: would it go into special election?
deleted by creator
How many have you killed so far then? Don’t be coy.
Is the answer “zero” despite your “really good reason”?
deleted by creator
“I have the solution to fascism”
“So you’ve solved fascism then?”
“No”
deleted by creator
Nice one clown.
You have the cure for fascism (guns) and have fixed it (despite not shooting any fascists), but somehow still need to use your guns (that you’ve never used) to stop the fascists (that you’ve fixed) from intimidating people out of voting against their canditate (who is also a fascist) by killing them (which is “a good thing”, that you’ve never done).
If you weren’t selling guns, you’d be selling healing crystals.
deleted by creator
and if Patriotic Democrats also die, you’ll still be happy? A decent trade in your eyes?
deleted by creator
“War is when overweight, middle aged men with no training, coordination or chain of command, parade around with small arms while the other side does a mass shooting”.
I think the fantasy is probably “far-right extremist kills an expendable minority, granting me a free murder with my cool guns”.