luckily this is just a 32; i had a 70 from the same brand with the same INSANELY FUCKING STUPID STAND DESIGN that i had to find something for…literally at the most extreme edges of the thing, what the fuck is this? this is so fucking stupid, it cannot be meaningfully cheaper than a proper design and it looks fucking dumb as hell and surely this has pissed off 90% of people that wanted a TV and want to put it on a little stand like a normal fucking person right??

  • Vilian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    they expect you to know the lengh of your own table that’s why they put the lengh on the site, also, the legs are already short, how OP expext the TV to be stable with it even shorter??

    • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If my 75" TV can have a small center stand under it there’s no excuse for smaller tvs to have extra wide stands.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is like a $150 TV. They aren’t going to make a $50 solid steel base and internal frame for that over some cheap injection molded legs.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can make a stable mount without legs as wide as the TV. I have two 27in, 1440p monitors, which both came with stands that were probably 30% as wide as the monitors themselves. However, the stands were weighted and primarily steel (I’m assuming it was steel anyway) with a plastic shell. A TV doesn’t need a wide base unless the company that made it is cheaping out and refuses to spend the money to make a weighted base.