It promises to be the one-in-all chatting app, based on matrix, providing compatibility to other apps (Telegram, Signal, WhatsApp etc.) through bridges.

So what do you think, from a privacy point of view and also user friendliness on the other hand?

  • SleepyBear@lemmy.myspamtrap.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “For example, if you send a message from Beeper to a friend on WhatsApp, the message is encrypted on your Beeper client, sent to the Beeper web service, which decrypts and re-encrypts the message with WhatsApp’s proprietary encryption protocol.”

    So, not really end to end for most common use-cases.

    • fulano
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was thinking it was something like what pidgin does on desktop, adapted for mobile, and was highly enthusiastic, but realized it works using matrix bridges and doesn’t process locally…

      Well, at least it can be self hosted.

      • SleepyBear@lemmy.myspamtrap.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given this is !privacy and the advertise as front page features both “works will all your messaging apps” and “end to end encryption”, it seems important to flag currently those aren’t mutually compatible.

        It’s not their fault the apps don’t have e2e APIs, it’s a tough problem, but the secrecy and privacy guarantee is just “trust us to stick to our policy”. And they’re a start-up, tooling isn’t perfect (or even exist), mistakes happen, etc

        Their self-hosting looks interesting, but then it said to use your own clients too, which took the fun out of that.

        • asap@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          it said to use your own clients too, which took the fun out of that.

          You can use Element, which is essentially the same thing as Beeper’s client:

          https://element.io/