Deegham@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agomeasuring rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square239fedilinkarrow-up11.36Karrow-down11
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imagemeasuring rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneDeegham@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agomessage-square239fedilink
minus-squareThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 months agoNot nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.
minus-squareThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoOh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.
minus-squareFal@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoCope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation
minus-squareThisOne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-27 months agoOof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?
Not nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference
I WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.
Oh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.
Cope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation
Oof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?
You’re objectively dumb