• CloverSi@lemmy.comfysnug.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the point they were making was that someone whose home, safety, or means of income were damaged or destroyed would have a different perspective than someone who wasn’t adversely affected, regardless of the big picture.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh I agree with that statement, the original comment just needs to be narrowed down. Nobody’s city was destroyed. Some people had their business properties destroyed, but I imagine most of the shops that were broken or burned had some sort of insurance, and most of them avoided bankruptcy.

      I do feel bad for anyone whose livelihood was affected by that, though. I think a lot of the rioters’ anger was misplaced. I especially feel bad for any of smaller businesses that were affected. Walmart and Target can handle all of their stores being burned, but your local mom and pop shop might not bounce back from that.

      • Drusas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is you framing protesters as rioters. There were relatively very few rioters and a lot of them were simply opportunists who would have been rioting regardless of what the protests were about. Bad actors exist everywhere.

        • SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was the riots that most people I know of had problems with. The violence, the destruction of property (500 million dollars in Minneapolis alone, which is a lot), Secoriea Turner, an 8 year old little girl who was shot to death during protests for the crime of her parents trying to turn the car around in a Wendy’s parking lot. And the opportunistic looting done in the name of the “protests” and defended in the establishment media (how many news and opinion shows had that piece of garbage who wrote the book “In defense of looting” on?)

          On the other hand, I was uncharitable in both my examples. Do you think the Canadian truckers were trying to secretly clone Hitler?

          • Drusas@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I never said anything about the truckers and you’re making yourself sound insane. Try to stay focused.

            Also, the establishment media largely also demonized protesters, just not nearly as much as Faux News did.

            • SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the same post you’re whining about, I said that the trucker protesters were trying to secretly clone Hitler. Apparently you missed that there was all kinds of hyperbole.