• bamboo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well you typically need standing in order to file a lawsuit, who would do it? Mozilla are probably the only ones. Why would this cause them to do it when past similar practices haven’t?

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On what standing though? Mozilla potentially has standing, and if the government finds that google is a monopoly, then the government could have standing, but nobody else.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Users affected by it, Mozilla, any other company that comes to support Mozilla, watchdog groups like the EFF…

      It can also be brought by attorneys general and governmental regulators, the FCC and FTC might have a bit to say about it…

      Antitrust suits aren’t civil cases, I don’t think, so “having standing” is a bit different

      I’m not a lawyer though so I could be way off base, but the antitrust cases I’ve been aware of I don’t think they were brought by companies but by government agencies

    • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t Mozilla a non profit? I don’t they can sue for anything along the lines of hurting profits to the company.