New York intends to have electric air taxis by 2025::undefined

  • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rail infrastructure costs money to maintain. So do roads, for that matter. If this is the first step towards ubiquitous pollution-free air taxis, we should be cheering, not grousing.

    • tillimarleen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, let‘s get rid of this antiquated shit. I‘ll cut my legs off and copter out of this ridiculous set

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m just glad that vehicle take off, landing, flight and maintenance requires no associated infrastructure.

      • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does it need road? Rail? Asphalt, steel, or concrete, which wear down and need to be replaced? Or does it just need a standard charging station as used by current EV’s? FFS, get over your fucking normalcy bias.

        • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Extensive air traffic control and dedicated infrastructure that is applicable, likely proprietary, only for this one service (including anything power related), significantly higher inherent risks in its operation. A service that caters for the slightest fraction of travellers and the more people using it, the less practical an idea it is.

          Normalcy in wanting services that have a meaningful impact for more than a handful of people.