• philm@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      but effectively it’s bash, I think /bin/sh is a symlink to bash on every system I know of…

      Edit: I feel corrected, thanks for the information, all the systems I used, had a symlink to bash. Also it was not intended to recommend using bash functionality when having a shebang !#/bin/sh. As someone other pointed out, recommendation would be #!/usr/bin/env bash, or !#/bin/sh if you know that you’re not using bash specific functionality.

      • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Still don’t do this. If you use bash specific syntax with this head, that’s a bashism and causes issues with people using zsh for example. Or with Debian/*buntu, who use dash as init shell.

        Just use #!/bin/bash or #!/usr/bin/env bash if you’re funny.

        • wolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          #!/bin/bash doesn’t work on NixOS since bash is in the nix store somewhere, #!/usr/bin/env bash resolves the correct location regardless of where bash is

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Are there any distos with /usr/bin/env in a different spot? I still believe that’s the best approach for getting bash.

              • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I do think a simple symlink is superior to a tool parsing stuff. A shame POSIX choose this approach.

                Still the issue that a posix shell can be on a non-posix system and vice versa. And certificates versus used practice. Btw, isn’t there only one posix certified Linux distro? Was it Suse?

                • The Liver@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Posix certification is dumb but posix compliance is nice to ensure some level of compatibility.

                  Symlinks would be pretty bad in the case of nixos. Wouldn’t fit at all

        • quantenzitrone@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          /bin/bash won’t work on every system for example NixOS some other systems may have bash in /usr/bin or elsewhere

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        No no no no no, do not believe this you will shoot yourself in the foot.

        https://wiki.debian.org/Shell

        Beginning with DebianSqueeze, Debian uses Dash as the target of the /bin/sh symlink. Dash lacks many of the features one would expect in an interactive shell, making it faster and more memory efficient than Bash.

        From DebianSqueeze to DebianBullseye, it was possible to select bash as the target of the /bin/sh symlink (by running dpkg-reconfigure dash). As of DebianBookworm, this is no longer supported.

      • SurpriseWaterfall@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is a symlink, but bash will automatically enable posix compliance mode if you use it. So any bash specific features will bomb out unless you explicitly reset it in the script.

      • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wut that is not even the case for Ubuntu. You’re probably thinking of dash example:

        sh -c '[[ true ]] && echo ya' 
        # sh: 1: [[: not found
        
        bash -c '[[ true ]] && echo ya' 
        # ya