• Kiosade@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      But like… how did they even do the first step of ramming the wood piles into a deep ass river without big machinery of some kind?

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        Long time and unlimited resources is usually the way to go. Sure machinery would make it fast, but you can get 10 guys to hammer for 2 years to drive it. Then move on. Even today it’s a huge logistics and financial problem to build bridges which is why typically it’s always governments that did it.

      • Glemek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        The machine that shows up about 3 seconds in looks to me like a manual piledriver, uses pulleys and cranks yo pull the weight up, then just gravity to drop it down the track.

        • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Kinda does, yeah, but it’s only put into place after all the piles are in! Maybe they have one of those anchored on a boat or something?

      • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sledgehammers (or similar) and lots and lots of manpower I’d guess. It’s how they made it watertight before they drained it I’m interested in

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          The weight of the water will push wooden pilings together. The flow of water though the gaps will also bring mud and debris into the cracks.

          It’s not perfect, and would need a lot of pumping/water removal, but it’s just a case of manpower, at that point.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            In the old days they made two walls and poured dirt between them. That stopped a lot of water going in if not all.

        • Ieatcrayons@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          It doesn’t need to be fully watertight. The rate of water passing into the dry area only needs to be lower than the rate you can pump it out.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        The oldest way to do it is to start from a bank and work your way in section by section.

        It’s a cofferdam if anyone is interested.