Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoIndustrial robot arms are scary dangerous.hexbear.netimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1105arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1105arrow-down1imageIndustrial robot arms are scary dangerous.hexbear.netYuritopiaposadism [none/use name]@hexbear.net to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-text
https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/south-korean-man-killed-by-industrial-robot-that-identified-him-as-a-box
minus-squareAntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·edit-21 year agoThe thing should be turned off whenever a flesh body is within reach. No software solution is going to be truly safe.
minus-squarecarpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·1 year agoBest practices is having robotic arms inside cages to prevent people from physically being able to access a machine’s circle of blood. Auto turnoff systems are still fundamentally software and aren’t as reliable as physical lockout
minus-squarebrightpantslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThey use lasers attached to a kill relay to create a virtual cage. You can do it only with electronics, no software
minus-squarecarpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYeah I’ve worked around a lot of heavy machinery and I’ll trust the fence thanks.
The thing should be turned off whenever a flesh body is within reach. No software solution is going to be truly safe.
Best practices is having robotic arms inside cages to prevent people from physically being able to access a machine’s circle of blood. Auto turnoff systems are still fundamentally software and aren’t as reliable as physical lockout
They use lasers attached to a kill relay to create a virtual cage. You can do it only with electronics, no software
Yeah I’ve worked around a lot of heavy machinery and I’ll trust the fence thanks.