I mean, you probably should just give up on trying to convince them tbh

They’re far too emotionally invested. It’s not worth your time

Convince somebody else that’s easier to reach

I dunno how about this:

Zionism is a settler-colonial project to establish a “Jewish” ethnostate in Palestine that slowly gained momentum in the mid-19th century and was accelerated by European antisemitism. Its chief architect was a guy in the Austro-Hungarian empire in the late 1800s.

Settler-colonial means it’s premised on stealing land and property from the people that already live(d) there, and to do so uses extreme violence and ethnic cleansing. A fundamentally genocidal project, it has a lot in common with the genocide of indigenous Americans, including the racist excuse-making for why their genocide was/is good for the people they’re genociding, ever-shrinking ghettos, regular racist massacres, dehumanization of their target, and a rationalization that they’re destined to own and control the land. The Zionist state gained its initial footholds through British colonialism in the 1920s-1940s, which initiated the apartheid regime and prompted the anti-colonial backlashes that gave the British and other Zionists the excuse to annex more land via genocide. This oppression-uprising-annexation pattern has repeated itself a few times, now settling on a (usually) slow genocide and expropriation of Palestinians under an apartheid regime. This pattern has always required the explicit material support of the predominant Western superpower (British and then American), as the indigenous inhabitants and their neighbors oppose the Zionist project.

The modern Western impression of Palestine is based on ignorance and lies, the most fundamental of which is to frame it as an age-old religious conflict rather than a recent colonial and anti-colonial struggle. Zionists conflate their genocidal racism with Judaism, which has led to much of this confusion. However, to repeat the claim that Zionism is about being Jewish is itself an antisemitic to say, as it suggests that to be Jewish is to drive a people from their homes, to steal their orchards and villages, to discriminate against them, to bomb their children.

Modern Zionism requires the dehumanization of the Palestinians. Anyone with a heart that knows the humanity of that people rejects Zionists as fascistic, genocidal settlers that should be opposed in every way possible.

Herr Schmidt from Chile assures me that my opinion on the Third Reich is invalid because his family ties on the ground contradict me.

Just watched a jimmy dore video that explained it pretty well.

Yes

Jimmy dore. But it’s some fill in host

I can offer many quotes of Zionists just being Nazis:

“The Zionist rejection of the liberal/assimilationist position of the majority of central and west European Jews was firmly rooted in the conviction that the Jews constituted a unique race. Even the ideas of the important nineteenth-century racial theoretician Joseph Arthur de Gobineau were enthusiastically received by a few German Zionists before World War I. In 1902, the Zionist newspaper Die Welt accepted Gobineau’s theories on racial degeneration and the desirability of maintaining racial purity, noting that Gobineau had pointed to the Jews with admiration as a strong people that believed in the necessity of maintaining its own racial purity. Elias Auerbach and Ignaz Zollschan, central European Zionists during the years before World War I, pointed to the desirability of racial purity and national homogeneity. Auerbach used Gobineau’s theories to support his contention that a people would never die so long as it was able to maintain its purity and uniqueness. Zollschan went so far as to praise much of the racial philosophy of the famous nineteenth-century anti-Semitic philosopher and historian Houston Stewart Chamberlain. While supporting Chamberlain’s argument that racial purity conferred nobility on a people, he argued that Chamberlain’s essentially correct approach to race was flawed by mistaken notions of Jewish depravity and inferiority. Even Martin Buber used the concept of a “community of blood” as a metaphor to describe the strong national bonds from which the Jewish people have historically derived their strength.”

“My family is doing a genocide, don’t you say different!”