L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoRenewables surprisingly "on track" to meet net zero by 2050newatlas.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1193arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1189arrow-down1external-linkRenewables surprisingly "on track" to meet net zero by 2050newatlas.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareeleitl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-21 year agoThat would be sure nice, but the hard numbers of the physical reality say otherwise. If you think we do have 50 years I recommend to reexamine the data. E.g. https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambitions is pretty comprehensive.
minus-squareeleitl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoIf you want to have an argument, try using arguments. Quantitative ones, like in https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambitions If you don’t want to have a conversation, continue to use empty assertions and slurs. But count me out of that. Your choice entirely.
minus-squareSCB@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoSorry bro I don’t ever buy into doomposting. Enjoy being meaninglessly sad.
That would be sure nice, but the hard numbers of the physical reality say otherwise.
If you think we do have 50 years I recommend to reexamine the data. E.g. https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambitions is pretty comprehensive.
Ok doomer.
If you want to have an argument, try using arguments. Quantitative ones, like in https://escholarship.org/uc/energy_ambitions
If you don’t want to have a conversation, continue to use empty assertions and slurs. But count me out of that.
Your choice entirely.
Sorry bro I don’t ever buy into doomposting.
Enjoy being meaninglessly sad.