• Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wtf difference does thst make?! Do you think the facts and sources are nullified since it’s labeled a commentary?

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The facts are basicly everything that happend in the past, as that can be measured. Everything about the future is just a comment from the author. It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.

      So if you actually care for the facts, it is that since Germany stopped its nuclear power plants Germany is producing less fossil fuel electricity. That graph comes straight from the Reuters piece. The question is if it continues that way and that is still open.

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the Reuters article says it most likely won’t and will be substituted with fossil fuel! And by going by that argumentation, I’m surprised you’re not suggesting climate change is just speculation since it’s all based on models and predictions

        • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Again, can you read?

          It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.