• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then please complete your argument. One person is contributing money into the equity of the house without ownership, and I believe you’re arguing that is unfair, because the homeowner its benefiting.

    What actions are you proposing is fair to the non-homeowner that doesn’t make it unfair to the homeowner?

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      My argument is complete. Feel free to read the other ten replies where I address the same comment

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You and I are conversing and you want me to chase your other conversations with other people? I think you’ve overestimated my interest in what I believe is your flawed argument. I guess we’re done then. Have a nice day!

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sorry, I’m not following everyone else’s conversations. I can’t speak to what others are saying. You seem to be comfortable aggregating the conversations and expecting others to do the same, so I can see why you have that response. Clearly we’re at the end of productive conversation. You’re welcome to continue replying if you like, but I won’t be reading your responses.

            • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m responding to ten people, sorry I can’t hold your hand and carefully caress your condescending replies.