• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shouldn’t be surprising given that China has a huge and well educated population. China outnumber USA STEM Grads 8 to 1 and project to be 15 to 1 by 2030. China has also overtaken the US both in quantity and quality of research. And of course, China has a huge advantage with the state playing a major role in guiding the type of technology China focuses on instead of leaving it to the markets. So, it should be no surprise that China is already surpassing the west technologically now, and the gap will only keep growing going forward.

          • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Really, different countries are doing research on solid-state batteries, who’da thunk.

            What does that have to do with China allegedly being an „appropriation committee“?

            • chowder@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              They just copied the Japanese breakthrough, what does that have to do with China copying things?

              • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Those two reports have literally nothing in common except the words „breakthrough“ and „solid-state batteries“, lol.

                You absolutely don’t understand anything at all, so please just stop talking. Thank you.

                • chowder@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah beyond being about breakthroughs specifically about solid electrolytes, nothing in common. lol

                  • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    good grief… 🤦‍♀️

                    I mean you really do not have to know anything about this technology or even physics at all to understand that they’re working on completely different parts of that technology. How can anyone have reading comprehension skills that bad and still need to die on their little hill?

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nobody said the Chinese are copying everything, but goodie for you for making up an argument that no one is making.

          You should read your own articles after you use Google - the largest problem with your inaccurately titled and researched article is that the conclusions of that single, uncorroborated and unconditional headline (it wasn’t really a study) is based purely on the number of articles published, not on any actual technology or world content. China is by far the largest publisher of pseudoscientific articles, and there is no regulation on the validity of the data presented in those articles. Chinese researchers admit to pushing out their articles at the expense of quality, and the people tasked with identifying the false data within those scientific articles are overwhelmed by the amount of false articles. The Chinese scientific community turns out. You can read about that here:

          https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/chinas-fake-science-industry-how-paper-mills-threaten-progress/

          They publish false articles using duplicate and fudged data. That’s not racist, that’s academically and scientifically damaging and Irresponsible.