• neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Unpopular opinion: Limp Bizkits version is OK. You just have to ignore the fact that it’s sung by the biggest douche in the world being mopey about being a douche.

    Musically it’s fine, and by any other band of the era it wouldn’t have been so… icky.

    And it’s a lost opportunity - I’m sure Wes would’ve loved rocking out during the solo-section if he was still in the band at that point. But since he wasn’t, they used some boring synth pads instead.

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        I wouldn’t go that far myself, but I can understand why some do. I was never really an LB fan, but I like a few of their songs, and Wes Borland is an awesome guitarist. I just consider Fred Durst to be a proto-incel who tries too hard.

    • Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      “And it’s a lost opportunity” THIS! I like their cover of Faith and how they got aggressive with it. First time I heard Behind Blue Eyes I was primed and let down. Behind Blue Balls is more like it.