I was making the comment in regards to a user that said me cheering on the halt of exploitation in the global south no matter the consequences in the first-world is accelerationism despite any halt of treats or disruption in the best interests of those in the west tend to differ than those “best interests” in the global south and thus would spawn reactionary movements despite whatever conditions when those treats are taken away.

Wtaf? I can’t even begin to fathom how that brain works, and although I should try to understand, so I can think through pros and cons, I’m not really sure I want to understand (really I do, I just have the not-subtle suspicion it’s going to be a word-vomit of the most foul garbage).