cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agof-stop explained with catslemmy.mlimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up1428arrow-down15
arrow-up1423arrow-down1imagef-stop explained with catslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squareeinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agosomeone care to explain to me why f1.4 is supposed to be the lowest f number jet i can buy a fresnel lens with a calculated f of 0.4?
minus-squareHiggs boson@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 hour ago f1.4 is supposed to be the lowest f number Where on earth do you get that idea? Lower is more expensive, so unless youre a pro, you dont see them as often.
minus-square9point6@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 day agoSimple, f1.4 isn’t supposed to be the lowest
minus-squareFetus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoYeah, I have normal camera lenses lower than that. From memory, the F-stop number is like a ratio between the focal length and the effective diameter of the lens.
someone care to explain to me why f1.4 is supposed to be the lowest f number jet i can buy a fresnel lens with a calculated f of 0.4?
Where on earth do you get that idea? Lower is more expensive, so unless youre a pro, you dont see them as often.
Simple, f1.4 isn’t supposed to be the lowest
Yeah, I have normal camera lenses lower than that. From memory, the F-stop number is like a ratio between the focal length and the effective diameter of the lens.