• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Courtesy of XKCD, long before we have to contend with unfriendly AI (we have committees of AI-techs working on this problem already) we’ll have to contend with someone like Musk or Bezos determined to own everything and capable of creating an AI-controlled army of killer robots.

    We’re not sure how rogue AI is going to manifest. We are sure rogue power-seeking humans exist all the time, and positions of power are commonly filled by them. (That’s the primary argument for election by sortition, or by lottery.)

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ok, so to be clear, you’re saying that AI x-risk is already partially or even mostly bundled under “We end stratified society and power disparity, or we die.”?

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        That is a good assessment. Yes.

        In fact, the race between capitalist interests to bypass safety and get operational AGI soonest is entirely about getting that power to be able to use it to hold everyone else hostage.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yeah, fair enough, I do agree that this is largely driven by capitalism, and if we didn’t have a capitalist society we would hopefully be going about this more cautiously. Still, I feel like it’s a unique enough situation that I would consider it its own x-risk.