• utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not trying to be sarcastic here, I genuinely do not understand what you are saying. Please give an example and/or a reference, whichever is more convenient.

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sorry, it’s rare people are not asking for trouble here :)

        I mean that any (reasonable) distance travelled at 90km/h will have consumed less fuel than that travelled at 30km/h; given the same car is used, reasonable gear is selected, etc, of course. If there is less fuel consumed, then, naturally, the emissions are lower as well, since that’s just a byproduct of combustion.

        While travelling at 90km/h will consume more fuel per unit of time than at 30km/h, the speed increase makes up for that.