Transcript: https://youtubetranscript.com/?v=3XGIxUXDWqw
The video shows how alternatives may not be real solutions for many of those in need. I see it as an example of how we shouldn’t theorize solutions based only in our limited point of view or accept blindly that those in power did their due diligence and are not just in it for optics.
Same in Seattle and Tacoma. I ended up using paper bags a lot more which is nice. Paper bags are probably the alternative that people want but are too afraid they’ll rip. And they might, they are kind of weak. Subway had mostly paper bags but with little plastic around the handles for structural integrity. Allowing some plastics might be the solution. Reducing overall size.
I was living in Center Philly for a hot minute and I’d walk to Mom’s Organic Market, get handed paper bags, and hope the bags didn’t rip on the way back to the apartment; sometimes they broke, sometimes not.
Ultimately got a large backpack for when I didn’t feel like driving or catching a ride but larger grocery trips were always a pain. Either had to go to Whole Foods (gross) or take the turnpike over the bridge into Jersey and go to Costco.
Trying to exclusively walk/bike in some of these cities makes me wish for a robotic exoskeleton with big pockets.
Aren’t paper bags worse for the environment? In the manufacturing process.
Paper bags use 4 times more water and energy, and creates 5 times more solid waste but it doesn’t leave something in the Earth that has seeped into everything we’ve known. Paper bags are biodegradable, plastic bags are a huge contributor to microplastics. There are no perfect solutions in life. Paper bags contribute to climate change less than plastic bags and don’t contribute to microplastics. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/291023/scho0711buan-e-e.pdf is a study that shows paper bags become “environmentally friendly” in 3 usages and plastic bags in 4. But the issue is that a lot of paper bags don’t make it to 3 uses and break before. So, if you know you are going to use the bag exactly once and then toss it. The best bet for climate change and microplastics is paper bags.
Paper bags also potentially contribute more to acid rain due to the chemicals they use to treat paper and fertilize the trees. But acid rain isn’t a big issue currently. We did well to prevent that. So it’s a balance of evils. It’s like a bunch of world disaster sliders that when you move one, others adjust. A little more acid rain, a little less climate change, and microplastics.
There is no perfect solution here. Cotton reusable bags have to be used 131 times to be environmentally friendly and frankly. I’ve not found what other environmental effects cotton manufacturing has on the planet but I bet you it’s more than just energy and climate change related.
So overall this isn’t a complete picture, no one has that. I use paper bags because it seems like the best solution currently. Recycling paper is relatively easy and something that some people do in high school or middle school. Besides recycling them they are also biodegradable, they completely break down and don’t harm the environment. You can’t recycle plastic bags due to the type of plastic it is so they are directly a waste product that’s non-biodegradable and photodegrade over 1,000 years.