• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    If mentioning a genocide helped elect Trump, then doing the genocide helped Trump far more, so I don’t know why you’re not attacking the dems for that.

    The genocide charge wouldn’t carry any weight if it wasn’t true.

    Why is this genocide more important to you as a political football than as, you know, a genocide?

    You’re a genocide denier. You’re not denying it’s happening, you’re just denying it’s worth talking about, which is maybe worse.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m not denying it’s worth talking about. I’m saying that “not making the genocide even worse” is more important than feeling morally superior on the internet. Some people obviously disagree.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So are you mad at the dems for making the genocide even worse by doing a genocide which helped them lose an election thus making the genocide worse?

        Why is it leftsts’ fault for telling the truth and not dems’ fault for making it true?

        Why do we have to be fair to the dems to agree that Trump’s genocide would be worse when the dems worked so hard to make “worse” virtually unimaginable?

        Why do we have to be fair to you by always saying Trump is worse but you don’t have to be fair to us by acknowledging that there is an actual genocide?

        Just because you have some mental gymnastics to explain why the dems’ genocide is somehow something we shouldn’t talk about doesn’t mean you’re not denying it.