At the battle of Stalingrad in Russia both sides sent waves of infantry charging toward fortified machine gunner positions, resulting in total or near total losses, again and again. Don’t look for logic and efficient use of human resources in war.
A I recently learned that sacrificing large numbers of soldiers for little or no gain is a Russian tactic that goes back centuries. Apparently, in the Napoleonic wars, sending soldiers forward to die was known as “combat a la Russe”.
At the battle of Stalingrad in Russia both sides sent waves of infantry charging toward fortified machine gunner positions, resulting in total or near total losses, again and again. Don’t look for logic and efficient use of human resources in war.
Field Marshall Haigh would’ve loved Stalingrad to show how it’s properly done - His ghost found the casualty rate laughably low.
“Field Marshal Haig is about to make yet another gargantuan effort to move his drinks cabinet six inches close to Berlin.”
-Edmund Blackadder
Shhh only the Russians would use such tactic, never the efficient Germans ☝️
Allowing your troops to be encircled because GERMANY STRONK is a legitimate tactic, wdym?!?
A I recently learned that sacrificing large numbers of soldiers for little or no gain is a Russian tactic that goes back centuries. Apparently, in the Napoleonic wars, sending soldiers forward to die was known as “combat a la Russe”.
Not a military historian but this doesn’t pass a basic smell test lol