Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agoIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down12
arrow-up163arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-22 days agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squareWolfLink@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 day agoThe treaty isn’t the technology, it’s the result of people much better informed on the topic considering the scenario you are asking about. The technology is the hypothetical anti-ballistic missiles.
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 day agoThat’s foolproof?
The treaty isn’t the technology, it’s the result of people much better informed on the topic considering the scenario you are asking about.
The technology is the hypothetical anti-ballistic missiles.
That’s foolproof?