Squorlple@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 days agoA bit tongue in cheeklemmy.worldimagemessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up193arrow-down120
arrow-up173arrow-down1imageA bit tongue in cheeklemmy.worldSquorlple@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·21 days ago2016 is the easiest: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/ But it’s been almost a decade since that story broke, and people still pretend it didn’t happen… I’m not complaining tho, it’s an easy way to disprove everything you’re saying. It’s undeniable that the 2016 primary was influenced.
minus-squareDomeGuy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 days agoYou’re really bad at arguing your position. How exactly does a “the DNC was broke and badly run in 2016!” cash-out book translate to proof that the democratic primary contests didn’t go to the candidate who got more votes?
2016 is the easiest:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/
But it’s been almost a decade since that story broke, and people still pretend it didn’t happen…
I’m not complaining tho, it’s an easy way to disprove everything you’re saying. It’s undeniable that the 2016 primary was influenced.
You’re really bad at arguing your position.
How exactly does a “the DNC was broke and badly run in 2016!” cash-out book translate to proof that the democratic primary contests didn’t go to the candidate who got more votes?