• suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If they can charge 30% less without Apple’s fees, then why are their prices the same whether you buy on their iOS app or direct on their website? Why have they been overcharging users who don’t buy through the iOS app by 30% all this time?

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      ·
      1 day ago

      Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn’t change it then:

      Because Apple literally tells people that they’re not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago…

      • patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Some things do charge different amounts though. YouTube Premium for example is more expensive if you subscribe in iOS but maybe that’s just because it’s Google.

        They also could have just not let anyone subscribe through the iOS app. Lots of things do that.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve noticed this too, there’s no consistency. Some companies seem to get away with two prices, others not.

          • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            When people tell you the laws are behind internet they’re taking about this all of this ND social media is unregulated but imagine if psychological abuse was the reason social media was successful.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is the same on most platforms. You’ll rarely find a product for different prices in different places because if they’re listed on Amazon, Steam, Apple, Google, etc. they’re not allowed to.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That isn’t exactly true with Steam. Valve does allow a dev to offer a discount at a different store as long as that same discount comes to Steam in a reasonable amount of time.

          Straight from the docs:“It’s OK to run a discount for Steam Keys on different stores at different times as long as you plan to give a comparable offer to Steam customers within a reasonable amount of time.”

          • Max@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            22 hours ago

            That’s probably only for selling steam keys on another store. You might be able to sell non steam versions for any price you want

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Yes but recent lawsuits have exposed that their policies and their enforcement aren’t aligned.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Most favored nation clause. Apple gets the lowest price that you offer. I’d you offer any discounts elsewhere, that have to be the same on the app store