• andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Regardless of any value you might see from the research, it was not conducted ethically. Allowing unethical research to be published encourages further unethical research.

    This flat out should not have passed review. There should be consequences.

    • deutros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If the need was justified big enough and negative impact low enough, it could pass review. The lack of informed consent can be justified with sufficient need and if consent would impact the science. The burden is high but not impossible to overcome. This is an area with huge societal impact so I would consider an ethical case to be plausible.