• Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      AI is already being used to assist simulation. One team used it to train robots by taking photos of a room and having the AI simulations train the robot on movements virtually instead of having to physically repeat the tasks in a real space. A quick search will yield many examples of the work being done that will allow the types of simulations you don’t see now being done in 5-10 years.

            • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              my response to the OP was about a fictional communist AI to save humanity, clearly riffing on the OP’s title, which prompted all the debate perverts to come out and make sure everyone understands that LLMs aren’t actually HAL 9000.

            • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Is it confusing or are you just so locked in on your special interest that you are ignoring the context? I made a comment about a future CPC AI that I have imagined for fun, someone responded to inform me about how LLMs work, which isn’t what I was talking about, I responded saying of course that is true, then elaborated the idea they had misunderstood in my original comment.

              You even left out the part where I clarified that LLMs as they stand are a part of paving the way towards the idea I brought up. If something like what I have imagined for kicks is ever made, LLMs will certainly be a part of its development.

              I’m sure I could have been more concise but considering you used the word “gaslighting” to describe what you feel my comment was, it seems like you just reaching heavily for the outcomes you seek

                • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yet others are not reading it that way, so maybe there are multiple people who are just skimming over what I said to find what they want to go in on.

                  I appreciate you clarifying your original comment.

                  Or do you rather mean that the insights obtained while developing LLMs can help us towards those better machine learning applications?

                  Yes, exactly this. I don’t think the future technology we have both fantasized about is just a beefed up chat gpt, but that the field of machine learning as a whole will advance and LLMs are a part of that process.