• lunachocken@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      What about the cars prior that are objectively worse in more ways than one. That probably had a much higher kill rate on both people AND animals.

      • DogWater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I didn’t say there was a problem with the train lol just don’t put grass on the tracks

          • DogWater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            They definitely dont understand that this grass is dangerous.

            What’s your point

              • DogWater@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Yes there is. Some small animals burrow in grass like rabbits and mice like I’ve already said and insects are food for birds like I’ve already said.

      • DogWater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, being concerned about putting creature habitat directly where trains run is trolling.

        it’s about not being stupid. You aren’t gaining anything useful putting grass between the rails of a metro besides potential problems.

        Someone said it’s been done successfully, which is surprising if true, but it’s still not really doing anything.

    • UnfairUtan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Tracks like these have been successfully used in a lot of cities already. It’s objectively better imo

      • DogWater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Seems dubious, but I’m curious if animals genuinely have a comparable hit rate on regular tracks vs grass filled rails.

        • UnfairUtan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s probably marginal.

          First of all, these are tramway tracks, and they’re usually inside of very urban areas which don’t have many animals roaming around.

          Secondly, I’m no expert, but I would argue that this sort of low cut grass will mainly attract insects. This might to birds being encouraged to find food there sure. But city birds are used to traffic and will most likely dodge tramways

          • DogWater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Only rational argument in this thread. I don’t think it would cause a genocide of urban animals, but it’s just annoying that a city would put something attractive to them in the path of a literal train

            • UnfairUtan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I get that.

              I’m really happy that more cities are doing it though. I’ve lived for years in a city that has those in some sections, and I really appreciated walking / biking near them compared to regular tracks.