"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoTRUCKIN'lemmy.worldimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1637arrow-down115
arrow-up1622arrow-down1imageTRUCKIN'lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 days agoI have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoI’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
minus-squareHupf@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoWouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?
I have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
I’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
Wouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?