return2ozma@lemmy.world to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 天前Luigi Mangione Musical Set to Debut Next Month. The Entire Run Is Already Sold Outpeople.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1453arrow-down119cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.worldluigimangione@lemmy.world
arrow-up1434arrow-down1external-linkLuigi Mangione Musical Set to Debut Next Month. The Entire Run Is Already Sold Outpeople.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 天前message-square48fedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.worldluigimangione@lemmy.world
minus-squareCruxifux@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 天前You are rambling absolute nonsense.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 天前I took your abso-fucking-lutely absurd analogy and ran with it. Skill issue on your part.
minus-squareCruxifux@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 天前No, you’re trying to be an absolutist about something you cannot be an absolutist about and it’s making you sound like a moron.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·24 小时前I think I understand your confusion. The statement was never absolutist. It was: Killing evil people CAN have [nothing but negative outcomes.] It does NOT say: Killing evil people WILL have [nothing but negative outcomes.] To reiterate the statement for you, it says that a murder does not always yield any beneficial results. Does that help you?
minus-squareCruxifux@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·24 小时前So your point is that murder may have beneficial consequences, or it may not, correct? Because nobody here or ever in the history of man is arguing that murder always has positive consequences.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·24 小时前No, that was your point. My point was that random murder in the streets is and should be illegal.
minus-squareCruxifux@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·19 小时前lol don’t tell me what my fuckin point was you goober hahaha
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·19 小时前Don’t ask me which one of us said it then.
You are rambling absolute nonsense.
I took your abso-fucking-lutely absurd analogy and ran with it. Skill issue on your part.
No, you’re trying to be an absolutist about something you cannot be an absolutist about and it’s making you sound like a moron.
I think I understand your confusion. The statement was never absolutist. It was:
Killing evil people CAN have [nothing but negative outcomes.]
It does NOT say:
Killing evil people WILL have [nothing but negative outcomes.]
To reiterate the statement for you, it says that a murder does not always yield any beneficial results. Does that help you?
So your point is that murder may have beneficial consequences, or it may not, correct? Because nobody here or ever in the history of man is arguing that murder always has positive consequences.
No, that was your point. My point was that random murder in the streets is and should be illegal.
lol don’t tell me what my fuckin point was you goober hahaha
Don’t ask me which one of us said it then.