• wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It’s incredible how people just don’t understand how tariffs work, but believe an aging man with early onset dementia’s and wears a diaper.

      • ZeroCool@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yep, Republicans have spent decades dismantling public education brick by brick and MAGA is the end result.

    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Can you explain it to me because I’d love to know more. My base assumption is if the US had a spike in food prices would they not dramatically increase interest rates, until food prices deflated?

      Rising rates would then drop their current asset bubble due to a contraction in money supply. Hence it could be seen not to be as much a tax as it would be a large amount of pain for existing asset holders who hold nominally valued assets, which would mainly be the rich?

      Another assumption I’d make is higher inflation would also lead to a lower unemployment and greater wage pressure, due to the phillips curve?

      • BearGun@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m no economician, but 1. this price hike has nothing to do with inflation, and 2. Interest rates aren’t used to bring prices down, they’re used to bring inflation down.

        • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          24 minutes ago

          The price hike causes inflation, as the tariff is passed on to consumers. Interest rates control the growth in the money supply, with less physical money available the velocity of money slows and prices fall, which causes deflation.