• SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Google has removed the video through an automated process without talking to the owner of the channel or verifying who owns the video in the first place.

    Honestly sounds like Hanlon’s Razor on Google’s part. No collusion necessary, just can’t be bothered to maintain/staff an actual effective system.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is exactly how YouTube’s DMCA takedown system works, and how media companies have been abusing it since it’s inception. Someone claims copyright on your video, and Google immediately takes it down. You then can contest the claim and Youtube will put it back up. But the claimant can contest your contest, and Google will then tell you that you can’t have it up and have to settle in court with the claimant. Oh, and you get a strike to boot.

      The whole process is automated, because there’s so much content now it’s impractical for every single takedown request to be addressed by a human. And because there is no punishment for bad-faith takedown requests, there is no incentive for the claimants to ensure their IP is really being infringed.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        12 hours ago

        And that’s how you get your own recording of a classical piece from centuries ago get taken down because it sounds like another copyrighted video. No fucking shit, we’re playing from the same sheet music.