Spectre@lemmy.ml to Shit Reactionaries Say@lemmygrad.ml · 5 days agoHarry Potter creator goes on rant about asexuals for some reason 🤷🏽♂️lemmy.mlimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmy.mllatestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
arrow-up141arrow-down1imageHarry Potter creator goes on rant about asexuals for some reason 🤷🏽♂️lemmy.mlSpectre@lemmy.ml to Shit Reactionaries Say@lemmygrad.ml · 5 days agomessage-square23fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmy.mllatestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
minus-squarecommiespammer@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·5 days agoHaving more asexual people is good for sexuals, actually, because it reduces competition.
minus-squareThe Free Penguin@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 days agoHow about we stop thinking about sex as competitive?
minus-squareImreallybored@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·4 days agoRanked Sex is the only kind I have
minus-squareHorse {they/them}@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 days ago“sorry honey, missionary is off-meta”
minus-squarenugs [Comrade/Them]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenugs [Comrade/Them]@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-24 days agolol sounds like the argument for getting rid of cars on the street and increasing public transport, funny that aint it? (I agree with both)
Having more asexual people is good for sexuals, actually, because it reduces competition.
How about we stop thinking about sex as competitive?
Ranked Sex is the only kind I have
“sorry honey, missionary is off-meta”
deleted by creator
lol sounds like the argument for getting rid of cars on the street and increasing public transport, funny that aint it? (I agree with both)