It’s probably because in real life Ramesses II had red hair
Rihanna also has red hair
The red hair on Ramses was never investigated for dye. This is because Egypt is EXTREMELY secretive with its mummies. What we do know is that his paternal DNA was pure West African (Not even East or North African).
To give you an idea of how secretive Egypt is, there are only 3 published Ancient Egyptian genomes available to the public. (At least back in 2021, idk if more were made available recently)
We literally have more published genetic data from 40,000 year old China than we do from 4,000 year old ancient Egypt, filled to the brim with perfectly preserved mummies. We have almost 100 published genomes from 30,000 year old Northwest Eurasia. Only 3 from Egypt.
Definitely possible. He also may have been naturally red haired. Maybe even red haired and dark skinned. We’ll never know until genomes are released under the supervision of international teams of scientists
I don’t care about DNA stuff, and to be honest there is a lot of weird race science wrapped up in people’s obsession with DNA. Nor can DNA actually tell you how someone looked in real life; it is simply one of the many factors that go into someone’s complexion and skin tone.
I gotta say though, there is something a bit uncomfortable about asserting that Egypt is being “secretive” with their cultural honoured and revered dead, when the history of “Egyptology” is the pillage and plunder of Egyptian history at the hands of white scientists seeking to build their own civilizational narrative.
No one owes western science unfettered access to their history or the right to assert western science as some objective truth-building endeavour.
I don’t care about DNA stuff, and to be honest there is a lot of weird race science wrapped up in people’s obsession with DNA.
that’s how we got here, the left’s (and liberals’) extreme refusal to engage essentialist frameworks.
This shit could’ve been nipped in the bud 20 years ago by just factually stating that white people are mutts who were formed 4000 years ago and depigmented due to eating grain and milk. If you ignore it the problem doesn’t go away, because people are naturally essentialist, but they’re also racist and stupid as fuck, so they do fake essentialism like white pharoahs and QIn Shi Huang had blonde hair
Nor can DNA actually tell you how someone looked in real life
yea thats my point. But it can tell you origins and Ramses’ Y-DNA was west African.
This is interesting and inherently political, because the existence of non-white and non-whiteadjacent people is inherently political, and them being in positions of power is even more political. To say that a Black person ruled over anybody in the past (or replace Black with dark skinned Indian) is an extremely political statement that upsets hundreds of millions of West-Eurasian-admixed people all over the world.
Okay but: Everything ever is whitecentric, this is a fact. And if everything ever is whitecentric, it also implies that huge swathes of things are Arab and Northwest-Indian centric due to their undeniable adjacency to whiteness under many different factors (skin tone, facial features, languages, actual genetic admixture, etc). AKA, West-Eurasian admixed peoples.
Egypt will not receive the fairest treatment from white scientists, but it will also not receive the worst treatment
no one owes western science
science is no more western than math is Indian. Less, even
Rihanna also has red hair
The red hair on Ramses was never investigated for dye. This is because Egypt is EXTREMELY secretive with its mummies. What we do know is that his paternal DNA was pure West African (Not even East or North African).
To give you an idea of how secretive Egypt is, there are only 3 published Ancient Egyptian genomes available to the public. (At least back in 2021, idk if more were made available recently)
We literally have more published genetic data from 40,000 year old China than we do from 4,000 year old ancient Egypt, filled to the brim with perfectly preserved mummies. We have almost 100 published genomes from 30,000 year old Northwest Eurasia. Only 3 from Egypt.
In many african cultures they use red clay to colour their hair, like several people of nearby countries, which may have “inspired” ancient Egyptians.
Definitely possible. He also may have been naturally red haired. Maybe even red haired and dark skinned. We’ll never know until genomes are released under the supervision of international teams of scientists
I don’t care about DNA stuff, and to be honest there is a lot of weird race science wrapped up in people’s obsession with DNA. Nor can DNA actually tell you how someone looked in real life; it is simply one of the many factors that go into someone’s complexion and skin tone.
I gotta say though, there is something a bit uncomfortable about asserting that Egypt is being “secretive” with their cultural honoured and revered dead, when the history of “Egyptology” is the pillage and plunder of Egyptian history at the hands of white scientists seeking to build their own civilizational narrative.
No one owes western science unfettered access to their history or the right to assert western science as some objective truth-building endeavour.
that’s how we got here, the left’s (and liberals’) extreme refusal to engage essentialist frameworks.
This shit could’ve been nipped in the bud 20 years ago by just factually stating that white people are mutts who were formed 4000 years ago and depigmented due to eating grain and milk. If you ignore it the problem doesn’t go away, because people are naturally essentialist, but they’re also racist and stupid as fuck, so they do fake essentialism like white pharoahs and QIn Shi Huang had blonde hair
yea thats my point. But it can tell you origins and Ramses’ Y-DNA was west African.
This is interesting and inherently political, because the existence of non-white and non-whiteadjacent people is inherently political, and them being in positions of power is even more political. To say that a Black person ruled over anybody in the past (or replace Black with dark skinned Indian) is an extremely political statement that upsets hundreds of millions of West-Eurasian-admixed people all over the world.
Okay but: Everything ever is whitecentric, this is a fact. And if everything ever is whitecentric, it also implies that huge swathes of things are Arab and Northwest-Indian centric due to their undeniable adjacency to whiteness under many different factors (skin tone, facial features, languages, actual genetic admixture, etc). AKA, West-Eurasian admixed peoples.
Egypt will not receive the fairest treatment from white scientists, but it will also not receive the worst treatment
science is no more western than math is Indian. Less, even
Also this line of logical reasoning doesn’t work so well when you realize modern Egypt moved entire temples to build a dam: https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20180409-egypts-exquisite-temples-that-had-to-be-moved