• SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I always thought the least believable part of transporters was that they worked without a pad on both ends.

    • Nmyownworld@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I accept transporting to somewhere without a pad because mumble, mumble, Star Trek science. What I always wondered about was how blasé folks usually were about transporting to somewhere that didn’t have a transporter pad. Who makes sure no one is standing in the beam to area. Does the transporter have safety protocols to just not transport if there is something of a certain size in the way? Transporting someone partially into rock has been shown in Star Trek (one instance, PIC s2e9). Weaponized use of a transporter, maybe by overriding transporter safety protocols? That was done intentionally, but still.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Even if the area was clear when the process started, what is stopping some space tumbleweed from blowing in there right after it starts?

        • Nmyownworld@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          If the safety protocols fail, resulting in a space tumbleweed hybrid, then Division 14 steps in. D-14 will send the affected to a medical spa on Endicronimas V, where they are pampered and tended to like a precious gem. (Lower Decks, “Much Ado About Boimler” s1e7)