cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/5332699

I have an SSD that’s around 5 years old now. It used to be in my laptop. But then I upgraded my laptop and put it in a homeserver. It still works perfectly well but from what I’ve read, SSDs fail suddenly without much prior indications.

Do you think I should replace it already? It’s not running any super important stuff. If it dies, it’ll just mean that my media servers will be down for a day, not a super big deal since I have regular backups. I feel bad creating unnecessary e-waste, so I’ll love to know your experience with SSDs and how frequently do you usually replace them.

Also, if you know a tool which can help me detect remaining lifespan of an SSD, that’ll be very helpful. Thanks.

  • Fubar91@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    You can track the health status of most smart enabled ssds. Can use a tool like crystal disk info

    Personally i have 2 7 year old ssds going strong without issue. Mainly used for storage and games, so the r/w rates been pretty lower on them.

    Ssds do have a total maximum write cycles to nand. Really depends on the use cases over the 5 years.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Not always does Crystal disk completely shine through the disk.
      Had a sandisk 512GB SSD which was completely fine.
      One day it suddenly became very slow with read and write performance. It was in the <20mb/s range amd painful to recover data from.
      CrystalDisk said everything is fine. Health = Good.

      Regarding the write cycles: If they ar used up the cells should enter a read only mode so that you should be able to recover the data from. Bad time if it’s the OS though.

      • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Regarding the write cycles: If they ar used up the cells should enter a read only mode so that you should be able to recover the data from. Bad time if it’s the OS though.

        This has never happened to me, but I suspect it’s because the controller is the primary failure point here.

      • Fubar91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Agreed, i mainly mention Crystaldisk because its a quick free tool. Definitely reccomend using multiple avenues of info gathering to determine hardware health.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Just saying so other less technical users don’t take the statement as a one stop tool and don’t act on it.

          @User with an issue: If the SSD behaves abnormaly than usual, back it up asap and replace it.

    • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’ve not been used too much, I think. My laptop had very typical laptop usage: browsing, reading docs, coding, nothing storage intensive. On the server, the most intensive usage is for PhotoPrism and Jellyfin, and I don’t think that’s anything out of the usual.

      • Fubar91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Id say they are most likely in good health. But anything could happen. Always reccomend having a backup option in place.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      many older ssd are actually better in terms of longevity because slc and mlc typically have/had higher endurance than newer tlc and (especially) qlc.