Summary

Since Trump’s second-term inauguration, five top billionaires have lost a combined $209 billion as markets react to policy uncertainty.

  • Elon Musk’s net worth plunged $148 billion as Tesla shares collapsed amid declining European and Chinese sales.

  • Jeff Bezos lost $29 billion as Amazon stock fell 14%.

  • Sergey Brin’s fortune dropped $22 billion following Alphabet’s weak earnings and regulatory pressure.

  • Mark Zuckerberg and Bernard Arnault each lost $5 billion as Meta and LVMH stocks tumbled.

The S&P 500 is down 6.4%, reversing gains seen post-election.

Non-paywall link

    • Also only meaningful if they can’t buy up actual, tangible assets in the coming recessions, effectively converting their dead capital into more assets. (+ getting more state money for being “too big to fail”)

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No, they’re gonna. It’s exactly what happened last recession. The pain got offshored to the workers, and the people with assets used the moment to leverage their assets to buy more assets on the cheap.

        • NeonNight@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yep, every time the US is in an economic low period, the top 1% snatch up swathes of assets for cheap. It’s how we went from 1 billionaire, to several, then several billionaires to hundreds in the last ~20 years

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          These companies will absolutely use these things as excuses to replace workers with AI chatbots.

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    So what? It’s not like their bank accounts got affected. Their shares are valued less which means they did not loose money but the lost money they could have had.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They lost pretend money that could be used for business loans that they don’t need because they have so much pretend money. The only time it matteds for these parasites is if it happens when they are acquiring another company worth billions of pretend monies.

      Even a stock market collapse is a benefit to these chucklefucks.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only time it matters for them is when an Italian plumber shows up to collect their debt.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Everything‘s on discount for them now! Time to buy up some cheap stock and failing businesses.

        They win no matter what.

        • Kyouki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Always stood by for, with (fake) money you can make more (fake) money.

          The issue is mostly getting towards that money first for us normies who aren’t born into RNG.

    • Captain Janeway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They basically use that “money” as collateral for low interest loans. So it impacts how much they can physically buy. It’s a good thing.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some of them (ahum you know which one) did lose actual value: the entire credibility of their biggest brands are down the drain for years to come… In that way the stockprices do really show that they are losing out. Some others really are losing (sort of) equal access to big important markets… The loss is real, even tho I agree with the sentiment of your post, the lowering stocks predict lowering income, lowering dividends which these people expect to rake in eternally to keep their billionaire lifestyle afloat, etc. They are slowly becoming less wealthy from the shennanigans. Not quick enough tho. A billionaire is a thing that just shouldn’t be allowed to exist ever anywhere.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Yes, the more they lose the more we win.

      PERSONAL AUSTERITY!!! SAVE YOUR MONEY AND LET THE RICH GO FUCK THEMSELVES!!!

      • piratekaiser@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You don’t win by them just losing some money. Redistribution is the name of the game. Even if Tesla hits 0/share, you aren’t getting any more wealth just by virtue of that happening.

        …Aside from basking in the downfall of a nazi of course, but those are priceless things.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It remains to be seen if their kissing the ring was strategic or just tactical (apart from Musk, who is committed), but what they’ve bought wasn’t a good economy. They bought into the transition from democracy and capitalism to authoritarian oligarchy.

    Dollars don’t describe the value of Russia-level corruption, which is where the country is now pointed. And the longer-term gains from captured institutions would far outpace a hundred billion dollars or two, if they succeed.

    • DokPsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Small but important point. We’ve been an oligarchy for a while now. We’re just losing the pretense of it being a democracy.

  • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Comparing my net worth to that total net worth? I’d be upset, but not terribly so, if I lost $1000 too.

    But since I would be getting it back later, and then some, it’s more like a small investment only . Definitely worth the small risk,

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m sure they will be able to weather the storm. I bet they could find a way to get by on “only” a billion, let’s say.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I know were in for a world of pain with the stocks tanking. But honestly don’t mind that they lose even more. Lose everything. Burn with us.

  • AreaKode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They don’t care. Stock prices only matter when purchasing and when selling. The day to day up and down has no affect on their direct worth.

    • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      False - these billionaires use their stock as collateral for loans. It’s all part of a tax avoidance scheme. If the stock goes down significantly, the banks come knocking.

      Both of the billionaires pictured also head their companies in some way or another. Investors can vote to throw them out. Not that they would, but even the vote of no confidence is not a good look.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Banks may come to them, but hardly knocking with demands. ‘If you owe the bank $100, that’s your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that’s the bank’s problem.’ And how they interact with banks, loans, etc. is far different in scale and method than the average consumer anyway.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only solace to watching all my retirement and investments get cratered is the fact that the assholes that brought this all about are taking the bigger hit.