Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.
☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory reading group on hiatus, will move to Lemmygrad later this year
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna’s Archive, libgen
This could be us but you playing
sadge
I’m having an internet outage. Luckily I have a CD player so I can still listen to music.
Analog FTW!
The internet’s back on! Still listening to this Blur CD though
i miss hexbear ngl
Same, especially the trans thread
They were always nice to me and considerate due to my dysphoria. I liked them a lot.
I miss the news thread more than the bear site tbh
me too
https://lemmygrad.ml/post/7189472
New post. Milestone one for me too, I think.
Went to see the Bab Dylun movie with Timothée Camembert and was surprised Pete Seeger and Woody Guthrie were in it. Maybe some good thing for the youth to see.
Yeah, they were both CPUSA members too, which is kewl for me pesonally, but Pete Seeger became a Webbite or at least sided with Angela Davis to dissolve Marxism-Leninism from the program of the Communist Party and to liquidate it in the 1990s.
One major disagreement was whether or not Boris Yeltsin was a good leader and the legitimate leader of Russian Federation; Angela sided with Boris Yeltsin in this case, and said the “August Coup” was wrong.
lol is there a way to change the way your phone number is displayed? For example if my number was 666666666 and i call someone and my number displayed was 777777777?
Im asking because i just got a scam attempt with a phone number that was exactly the banks number, they even mentioned to verify the number (to give them legitimity) but i knew it was a scam when they tried to make me do a retirement without card lol. I even called the same number and got the bank support.
I don’t have an active phone-number so I dunno.
Yeah you can spoof your caller ID to be any phone number at all. Scammers usually give themselves your local area code, but I’ve never seen one bold enough to pose as a bank. That’s definitely illegal if they’re ever caught (they won’t be).
goddamn orange man, stop bluffing with the tariffs
I hate how every time women’s sport is brought up someone will immediately use it to say that trans women should be excluded. Even about fucking disc golf.
I unfortunately haven’t the source for this, but I remember reading somewhere that somebody forced a transgender man to compete exclusively with women wrestlers, and he won against every single one of them.
I am personally very sad that the main line of argument that Democrats have taken against criminalizing trans women is “this will hurt cis women”, because who the fuck cares about trans women right??
I didn’t expect much & was still disappointed
Talked about women’s day at work and one of my coworkers said ‘well no sex for you then this saturday’ which was just proper weird tbh
Honestly, if it was a temp job or shit warehouse job like I’ve worked a million times I’d just say “no worries, your wife is stopping over for lunch”. Either you’ll get into a fist-fight or they’ll respect you. Not saying that’s the correct thing to do.
If you’re above that kind of thing, no worries, I get it. Sometimes these dipshits just wanna see how you can toss it back.
I would just point out that that is an incredibly inappropriate area to comment on at work
Trudeau dropped another nice effect of the Trump tariffs. When applied to economies that produce stuff in Canada or Europe, some companies may fail and be bought by US corpos. I don’t know if that would nullify the tariffs for them, but the US will them be able to turn around and proclaim “more jobs for US companies” despite those still operating abroad. Besides that, it’s monopoly capital doing it’s favourite thing.
this guy straight up making me question my sexuality, uyghur btw
I hope you all have a nice week :D
ᵘ²
i won’t but thanks oppo, i hope you do have a nice week 😞
U2
🇾🇪🔟✖️
I’m the guy sitting in the top right corner.
U2
So plump! :D
U2!
blank stare
U2
How do y’all talk to libs about how the media is portraying Trump as subservient to Putin? For example refusing aid to Ukraine and easing sanctions on Russia. I don’t really have a good answer other than the long history after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and that the US and Russia would probably never be allies.
I can understand why he’d be hard on Ukraine, but even I have trouble understanding why Trump seems so friendly with Russia
How do y’all talk to libs about how the media is portraying Trump as subservient to Putin?
Ask them why they love war so much. “Finally an American administration is trying to make peace with Russia and this is what you are most upset about?” Whatever the ulterior motive, an end to this proxy war is still a good thing.
And since i live in Europe and have to deal with our own uniquely European brand of deranged, delusional liberals, i usually add: “I wish our own politicians were as interested in peace rather than war. More money for war means less money for your parents’ pensions and your children’s schools.”
Of course we as communists understand the more complex geopolitics at play here. We don’t believe that Trump is just doing this because he’s some kind of do-gooder peacenik. But there’s no need to get into the weeds and start discussing imperial strategy when talking to liberals. They only comprehend the most simplistic of narratives and so you have to keep your responses extremely simple and dumbed down. Nuance is a no-no.
“Peace good, war bad. I don’t care about Putin or Trump, i care about stopping the dying. Why do you want people to keep dying?” That is all you need to say to them.
Its fairly clear to anyone following geopolitics that Trump appeasing Putin is an obvious attempt at wooing Russia away from China.
Like its not even a secret, every single conservative figure mentions it, from Tucker Carlson to Narco Rubio to Trump himself, this “oh trump is a putin puppet” rhetoric is just infantile discourse.
Blue maga likes to portray themselves as the intellectual wing of american politics but damn they so dumb too
Trump is friendly to Putin because Putin says nice things about Trump. Putin says nice things about Trump because Trump is vain and highly susceptible to flattery. (Look how easy it was for elon to brown nose himself into being trump’s left hand.)
Trump is impressed by Putin’s use of violence and his resolve. Trump would be afraid of Putin if he yelled and made threats. Trump should be scared but because Putin smiles and says flattering things he isn’t. Trump thinks he is getting respect from a dangerous person and he thinks that means he must be a dangerous person too.
Putin makes trump feel like a “big man.”
Trump hates zelenski because he’s a fraud. He acts all tough, talking in his growly voice like he’s batman, wearing millitary slacks and looking scrufy but then all he does is beg for help and money. When he isn’t begging he’s complaining that the help he got isn’t enough and it is everyone else’s fault.
Zelenski is a grifter. Trump hates that because inside he knows he is a grifter too. Trump isn’t the big deal businessman. the savvy politician or the billionaire land tycoon he pretends to be, he’s a 78 year old playboy failson who never made anything on his own. And everywhere he looks he is seeing that America is a grift too. He wanted to “Make it Great Again” but the more he looks the more he sees its just layers of kick backs and pay offs papered over and held together with string. Zelenski just reminds him of all that.
Trump wants to stop the losing war on Russia to focus on a war with China. This was known forever ago. The sanctions, funding arms, and even sending mercs to Ukraine has failed. It has nothing to do with subservience.
This was their goal https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB10014.html
Do you hear of feminists that stand with capitalism?
Not too sure what you mean by this, but the US suffragettes co-opted black women into their movement until they got what they wanted, then turned on their allies.
You can never trust a settler!
Currently reading women race and class, and yeah it was a real shame.
Not really. There are people who call themselves feminists that support capitalism but they are pretenders who haven’t really understood (or even read) any feminist theory. Like “anarchists” who want to live in mad max world.
“Nobody’s free until everybody’s free” True liberation ideoligy is infectious. How can you fight for the end of oppression for those born with XX chromosomes and not feel connection to those who are oppressed because they were born with higher melanin production genes? And why should being born to poor parents limit your access to education and job prospects? and why should people who’s parents own lots of things, never have to work?
I guess it depends on how you define it, whether as principled or not, and where its roots come from in understanding the struggle. But I know there are terms for like the whitewashing of imperialism under the guise of such causes. Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris in the US would probably be a good example of this kind of thing, where on a surface level, they support feminist messaging, but they also back the brutal capitalist and imperialist status quo. So it’s a co-opting thing.