Luna 9 (Луна-9), internal designation Ye-6 No.13, was an uncrewed space mission of the Soviet Union’s Luna programme. On 3 February 1966, the Luna 9 spacecraft became the first spacecraft to achieve a soft landing on the Moon and return imagery from its surface.
Spacecraft
The spacecraft carrying on top the lander capsule, weighed together 1538 kg and was 2.7 meters tall. It commenced the main descent, shortly before its controlled impact it ejected the lander capsule. The lander had a mass of 99 kilograms (218 lb) and consisted of a spheroid Automatic Lunar Station (ALS) capsule measuring 58 centimetres (23 in). It used a landing bag to survive the impact speed of over 54 kilometres per hour (34 mph). It was a hermetically sealed container with radio equipment, a program timing device, heat control systems, scientific apparatus, power sources, and a television system.
The spacecraft was developed in the design bureau then known as OKB-1, under Chief Designer Sergei Korolev (who had died before the launch). The first 11 Luna missions were unsuccessful for a variety of reasons. At that time the project was transferred to Lavochkin design bureau since OKB-1 was busy with a human expedition to the Moon. Luna 9 was the twelfth attempt at a soft-landing by the Soviet Union; it was also the first successful deep space probe built by the Lavochkin design bureau, which ultimately would design and build almost all Soviet (later Russian) lunar and interplanetary spacecraft.
Launch and translunar coast
Luna 9 was launched by a Molniya-M rocket, serial number 103-32, flying from Site 31/6 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in the Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic. Liftoff took place at 11:41:37 GMT on 31 January 1966. The first three stages of the four-stage carrier rocket injected the payload and fourth stage into low Earth orbit, at an altitude of 168 by 219 kilometres (104 by 136 mi) and an inclination of 51.8°.[2] The fourth stage, a Blok-L, then fired to raise the perigee of the orbit to a new apogee approximately 500,000 kilometres (310,000 mi), before deploying Luna 9 into a highly elliptical geocentric orbit.
Descent and landing
At an altitude of 8,300 kilometres (5,200 mi) from the Moon, the spacecraft was oriented for the firing of its retrorockets and its spin was stopped in preparation for landing. From this moment the orientation of the spacecraft was supported by measurements of directions to the Sun and the Earth using an optomechanical system. At 75 kilometres (47 mi) above the lunar surface, the radar altimeter triggered the jettison of the side modules, the inflation of the airbags and the firing of the retro rockets. At 250 metres (820 ft) from the surface, the main retrorocket was turned off by the integrator of an acceleration having reached the planned velocity of the braking manoeuver. The four outrigger engines were used to slow the craft. About 5 metres (16 ft) above the lunar surface, a contact sensor touched the ground triggering the engines to be shut down and the landing capsule to be ejected and its landing airbag being inflated. The capsule landed at 22 kilometres per hour (14 mph; 6.1 m/s)
Surface operations
Approximately 250 seconds after landing in the Oceanus Procellarum, four petals that covered the top half of the spacecraft opened outward for increased stability. Seven hours after (to allow for the Sun to climb to 7° elevation) the probe began sending the first of nine images (including five panoramas) of the surface of the Moon. Seven radio sessions with a total of 8 hours and 5 minutes were transmitted, as well as a series of three TV pictures. After assembly the photographs gave a panoramic view of the immediate lunar surface, comprising views of nearby rocks and of the horizon, 1.4 kilometres (0.87 mi) away.
The first photo ever taken from the surface of another celestial body.
The pictures from Luna 9 were not released immediately by the Soviet authorities, but scientists at Jodrell Bank Observatory in England, which was monitoring the craft, noticed that the signal format used was identical to the internationally agreed Radiofax system used by newspapers for transmitting pictures.
The radiation detector, the only dedicated scientific instrument on board, measured dosage of 30 millirads (0.3 milligrays) per day. The mission also determined that a spacecraft would not sink into the lunar dust; that the ground could support a lander. The last contact with the spacecraft was at 22:55 GMT on 6 February 1966
The successful Luna 9 landing was commemorated on stamps.
Hexbear links
- 🐻Link to all Hexbear comms
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread
- 👊 Share your gains and goals with your comrades in the New Weekly Improvement thread
- 🧡 Disabled comm megathread
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
I know it never would have happened, but it would have been really cool if marvel committed to actually killing off half of their characters in Infity War/ Endgame. Having a world where everyone has lost half of the people in their lives is such an interesting setting for so many stories. Show how that could change everything and everyone. By not undoing it, they could also show that these superheross and demigods can’t punch their way out of grief. Idk I think its a cool concept and it could have been so much more.
I didn’t make this up, they tried to do the trans women in sports thing over a beauty pageant, right? Like fully went “it’s not fair to cis women, trans women are just too pretty, they’re too talented”?
“You leftists are soooo oversensitive….now let me tell you about a time when I used to be left wing and abandoned all my ideas because a lefty was rude to me and now I’m a nazi! That’s what you get!”
deleted by creator
Confusing harassment from MeanwhileOnGrad regular
@TheFrirish@jlai.lu replied in clear bad-faith to a comment I made 10 months ago in a community I am permabanned from for calling out the moderators for censoring my comments pointing out the Democrat’s involvement in the genocide of Palestinians, was called out and reported by another user so their comment was removed, and then presumably Frirish went through my comment history and left a single downvote on every comment of mine, even the deleted ones.
This is the same user that has me tagged as “Tankie Influencer” and regularly posts about me, or mentions me, in MeanWhileOnGrad. Like, just how rent-free can you get? This user accuses me of “faking being nice” just to manipulate others and “push propaganda,” it’s very silly and normally I don’t care about users like them but this was particularly out of nowhere, I genuinely don’t know what to make of it.
Very silly interaction and I think they are in a bit of an emotional crisis to be doing something like this.
Leonard the Vinci my favourite artit
Guy who thinks the Israeli Occupation Force is officially called the Israeli Occupation Force because they stumbled onto a Second Thought vid and JT said Israeli Occupation Force 100 times in a video on the topic of the Israeli Occupation Force.
Sent a text to a pretty guy asking him if he wants to go to the movies
Wow the comment sections under GDF videos get really gross huh
Watched “Being John Malkovich” last night and it was really good. Nice to watch a Charlie Kaufman movie that doesn’t send me into an existential/depression spiral like Synecdoche, NY and Eternal Sunshine did
Anyone have recommendations for movies like those? Surreal, sorta comedy, memory, identity, etc. type shit
The other day I got Hillary Clinton as a sleep paralysis demon. Not even kidding.
The really real reason why debatebro was banned was not because of repetitive concern trolling or bad faith arguments, but because of turning a standalone/primary verb into a contraction.
Ex.: “They overestimated the patience that we’ve.”
Also, you may have heard of Cliff Wife and Curvy Wife, but nothing could prepare you for Cop Wife (i’m a chapo vet btw).
I’m rewatching Twin Peaks and actually trying to pay attention and not stay glued to my phone as I do with most film and TV nowadays. There is SO MUCH ridiculous shit I’ve missed. My favorite scene is when Major Briggs smacks Bobby’s cigarette out of his mouth and it lands cherry first into his meatloaf, sticking up perfectly
everything feels terrible alone at night when i don’t drink. i blamed my inability to immerse in any of the activities i might want to do during this time of day to depression, but im not that depressed rn broadly in the rest of my life, so im starting to think my drinking might be to self medicate my ADHD and my depression and anxiety??? definitely gonna finally look into a psychiatrist once my new insurance card comes to get on some dang amphetamines