Everyone knows the tale of Brand X getting bought out by some faceless global conglomerate and going to shit, but does the opposite ever happen?

  • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh yeah, extreme censorship, shitty mob votes, and a DLC marketplace. So reinvigorated.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The whole ‘censorship’ narrative was a nazi psy-op. I literally didn’t even hear about it because I blocked all the mientubers for unrelated issues, and the one guy who did eventually tip me off its existence was essentially parroting talking points straight from that guy who I blocked after I caught him trying to groom his majority child audience that what Notch said on twitter was OK and he was being cancelled.

      Like obviously I don’t trust macroshaft to do any chat moderation since they seem to think cracker is a deeply offensive racial slur but ret–d is just harmless banter, but when literally everyone making a stink about it is either an outright nazi propagandist or has close ties to one, it’s hard not to see what’s going on.

      • Neve8028@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The most concerning thing to me is the fact that they can ban users from playing on their own servers. Moderation should be on the server owners imo. Microsoft being able to ban someone from their own server that they self host or pay to host via a third party is a big issue.

        That being said, I don’t think that Microsoft’s moderation has been as apocalyptic as a lot of people made it out to be. It’s just the principle that I take some issue with.

          • Neve8028@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s a security risk because users can log in as other users. Regardless, if you paid for the game, you should be able to play on third party multiplayer servers.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              True on the risk aspect, there are authentication plugins you can get instead on the server side.

              On the ban aspect, I don’t see people making this claim for Steam, if you get banned on Steam you lose all your games, not just a $30 purchase, and maybe don’t call people slurs in online text chat? Idk, it seems like it was just an overhyped concern with few actually getting banned that didn’t deserve it somewhat.

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m generally libleft and I’m quite upset about it. I bought the game. I own the game. They shouldn’t be allowed to take it away from me. What if you were gay and a car bricked itself because the manufacturer didn’t approve of you frequenting a gay bar?

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The censorship is kind of rediculous, tbh I thought that was in before Microsoft. Don’t see the rest as negative, and development seems more stable in the new groove, with regular larger updates. Couldn’t vote on mobs at all before, and there is DLC for Minecraft??

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        All editions have DLC except Java. Many free Java features are paid in other versions. The problem with the mob vote is that they could totally just add all 3, but don’t.