JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThis isn't theft of need. A more insidious type of crime is pushing some stores to closewww.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down125
arrow-up113arrow-down1external-linkThis isn't theft of need. A more insidious type of crime is pushing some stores to closewww.cnn.comJustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 year agoI think people will simply do without. Such businesses are not profitable without massive public subsidies for the workers, anyway. Good riddance.
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoThat’s naivety speaking. People won’t do without and other companies will fill the need/want. That’s proven over and over (late stage capitalism).
minus-square【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoWhat I mean to say is they will do without WalMart and Target.
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoAnd I think you missed the point.
I think people will simply do without. Such businesses are not profitable without massive public subsidies for the workers, anyway. Good riddance.
That’s naivety speaking. People won’t do without and other companies will fill the need/want. That’s proven over and over (late stage capitalism).
What I mean to say is they will do without WalMart and Target.
And I think you missed the point.