🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴@vegantheoryclub.org to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-225 天前Jerkoffvegantheoryclub.orgimagemessage-square159linkfedilinkarrow-up1763arrow-down1152cross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1611arrow-down1imageJerkoffvegantheoryclub.org🏴 hamid the villain [he/him] 🏴@vegantheoryclub.org to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-225 天前message-square159linkfedilinkcross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmy.ml
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down8·5 个月前The government that actively tries to censor elements of news from their citizens. Yeah buddy, sure thing.
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down2·edit-25 个月前I said “Living in the US is sufficient cause to distrust its government.” You replied: “I can say the same for China” I replied: “Except you literally can’t.” Meaning you don’t live in China so you can’t make the claim with similar level of authority And then you made the comment I replied to, and I don’t see at all how it is connected to the line of conversation.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down8·5 个月前I guess I can’t because i don’t live in China, but you understand the point of my argument yet choose to play semantics. It’s fine
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·edit-25 个月前No, you said something that didn’t make sense.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down9·5 个月前Saying that the Chinese government censors news from their citizens and attempts to spread propaganda about themselves to the outside world doesn’t make sense to you?
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·5 个月前The point is you’re making an unsourced claim which doesn’t align with the topic of conversation.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down11·5 个月前Sucking up to the Chinese like a true tankie. Intellectualism is being able to admit that both the Chinese and US governments are bad actors
minus-squareOurToothbrush@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down3·edit-25 个月前True intellectualism is doing proper investigation before speaking. How many ordinary Chinese people have you talked to? Have you visited China?
Except you literally can’t.
The government that actively tries to censor elements of news from their citizens. Yeah buddy, sure thing.
I said
“Living in the US is sufficient cause to distrust its government.”
You replied:
“I can say the same for China”
I replied:
“Except you literally can’t.” Meaning you don’t live in China so you can’t make the claim with similar level of authority
And then you made the comment I replied to, and I don’t see at all how it is connected to the line of conversation.
I guess I can’t because i don’t live in China, but you understand the point of my argument yet choose to play semantics. It’s fine
No, you said something that didn’t make sense.
Saying that the Chinese government censors news from their citizens and attempts to spread propaganda about themselves to the outside world doesn’t make sense to you?
The point is you’re making an unsourced claim which doesn’t align with the topic of conversation.
Sucking up to the Chinese like a true tankie. Intellectualism is being able to admit that both the Chinese and US governments are bad actors
True intellectualism is doing proper investigation before speaking. How many ordinary Chinese people have you talked to? Have you visited China?