Clemson University to ban TikTok on all campus networks effective Monday, July 10.

  • booty_flexx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    [we are doing it for the] “integrity of information and resources connected to the Clemson network”.

    They’re not doing it to censor or discourage use. They’re doing it because they don’t want the software running on their network alongside their network resources.

    You can still use tiktok, just not while connected to their network infrastructure.

      • psykick@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fake news. American government would never spy on its own citizens!!

        /s

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no known western API access directly into your phones through any major social media company and if it were known it would get patched. I’ll take the American spyware over the CCP spyware any day of the week, thank you very much.

              • galloog1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I am just not in the habit of assuming your entire worldviews and opinions based on a tiny comment. I am familiar with PRISM. They also have guns in the United States government. Just because they have tools, doesn’t mean they are always used in ways you disagree with. PRISM does not imply that the private services are complicit, that they are used without a warrant, or that they don’t screw up from time to time and do the wrong thing.

                Now compare that to the CCP having direct warrantless access to 40% of American’s cellular devices 100% of the time. It’s one thing to say that you don’t trust western private company’s security policies. It’s farcical to suggest that it is equal to installing direct spyware on your phone from the CCP.

                Additionally, anyone can put something on slides, that doesn’t make it a full government record.

  • pandacoder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The ban is on campus networks, but the reactions I’m reading are acting like this is a ban on the campus itself.

    It’s not censorship (or fascism), just like if they blocked PornHub it wouldn’t be censorship (or fascism).

    And no, blocking PornHub on a university campus where the vast, vast majority of connected users are 18+ isn’t justifiable unless it was under the grounds of security.

  • Alkider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol how are they expecting to crack down on this if you can just use cell data.

    • Unseeliefae@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the point.

      People can use their own cell data to watch meme videos instead of hogging all the network bandwidth and slowing down wifi speeds for all the students who are trying to get actual schoolwork done.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is more to discourage the use. Using cell data for video can add up quickly.

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re only going to enforce it on their networks, if you want to run it on your cell that’s up to you. I think the point is to discourage it overall. If every institution makes the hurdle to use it higher, that will stem the use of it on campus.

        • zaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          M8 one more time: it is not about stopping students from using tiktok, it is about preventing tiktok from being accessed on the school network. No one cares if you turn off wifi and go on tiktok, that is literally what they want you to do if you wish to access it.

        • S_204@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you are seriously underestimating the laziness of your average college student, but that’s just my opinion.

    • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not following. Can you elaborate a bit on how a private university banning TikTok is fascism?

      • lps2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clemson isn’t private, it’s public. It is certainly their prerogative to secure their network and their users’ data but there are definitely concerns over government censorship. I don’t think this issue is as black and white as people ITT are making it out to be and absent a larger policy stance that would van TikTok or it’s practices, I’m not sure this is the right move though I understand their position given the inaction of state and national legislatures in banning foreign spyware

        • zaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re not banning their students from using tiktok, they’re blocking access to a website on their own networks. That is how network security works. I have many IP addresses block for many customers because some website shouldn’t be accessed on networks with PII. It’s really not that complicated.

      • irkli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because the only reason to bsn TikTok are racist reasons. Their practices have been examined closely and found to be less invasive than they rest. And Facebook, they’re horrible.

        The reasons usually given are mumbled generalities but refer to China getting access to American citizen data.

        “China” seems to be the common theme.

        The very data for sale on the open market. It’s all bullshit.

        I’m not defending TikTok and certainly not Chinese govt practices. They do evil. But no evidence of it in this instance.

          • Red Wizard 🪄@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s weird to think that you would support banning TikTok because of the influence China might have on US Culture, but are totally cool with the fact that Facebook is a tool of cultural export across the whole globe. I don’t remember the last time TikTok was the instrument of genocide, but hey, if you want to support that, go for it.

      • Red Wizard 🪄@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because there is no real Operational Security justification for its ban, that doesn’t instantly catch all US-based social media platforms as well. It’s not about security, it’s about control. The feds have no under-the-table deals or even overt surveillance partnerships with TikTok. They do have that with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and beyond. In fact, the CIA has financial stakes with those companies as well, and often were early sources of funding for them: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/social-media-is-a-tool-of-the-cia-seriously/

        Which I guess is fine because the CIA has never been the enemy of the American people, ever.

        • zaph@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So an American school doesn’t block an American website that American intelligence agencies have access to and you’re wondering why they wouldn’t allow a Chinese website that Chinese intelligence agencies probably have access to? I completely agree that Meta and Twitter and all that are horrible for security but it’s still relevant who houses that data. I choose not to use any of them but it’s completely understandable why a country would hesitate to trust a foreign nation we have no relevant triety with.

          • Red Wizard 🪄@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The Chinese agencies have access to whatever data they want on you. There is no moratorium on data brokers doing business with China. Even if there were, they would get that data from one of their BRICS partners.

            So they have data from TikTok. Now what? What’s next? What’s the threat they pose with that data to the American people or the students and faculty at this university?

            What is the university protecting it’s network from specifically?

            The CIA has a long history of unlawfully monitoring and retaliating against US Citizens for advocating against US policy, like opposing the war in Vietnam.

            From a historical standpoint, it would appear that citizens of the United States have more to fear from the CIA then they do from the People’s Republic of China.